Hey Milt,
I guess you are right.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 05:23 pm, Milt Epstein wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Nick Stoianov wrote:
> > To all of you "tomcat fans",
> >
> > Attacking me with these immature e-mails shows the following things:
> > 1. not accepting other people's opinions and experiences
> > 2. blindly repeating the same things over and over again.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> Frankly, you're the one that's being immature here -- as evidenced so
> well by the subject of your post. If you've got your mind made up and
> won't listen to legitimate suggestions from others, what's the point
> of coming in here and posting like you did. You're acting out,
> something a three year old does.
>
> Now, this doesn't mean you don't have some legitimate gripes. It may
> very well be that for your situation, Tomcat isn't suitable. That
> doesn't mean it "sucks", or that it's not suitable for others. Your
> situation just may be complex enough, or idiosyncratic enough, that it
> will be problematic for you to use Tomcat. And perhaps for a number
> of reasons, it's just not possible for you to spend a lot of time
> trying to figure out how to get Tomcat to do what you want, you want
> it to work the way you want out of the box, or have someone else
> figure it out for you. So a heavy duty commercial product with
> support may be a better choice for you. But it's going to cost you
> (whereas Tomcat is free). But that's a choice you're making as to how
> best to allocate your resources (and it may perfectly well be a
> legitimate choice). Again, it doesn't mean Tomcat "sucks", it's just
> not what you need (and I've probably heard complaints about most of
> the other products out there, including commercial ones).
>
> Milt Epstein
> Research Programmer
> Software/Systems Development Group
> Computing and Communications Services Office (CCSO)
> University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
