Nick, On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:53, Nick Stoianov wrote: > 2. Virtual hosting for Tomcat is almost impossible - especially if you have > a load balancer in front of the web server. I find the virtual hosts work fine with the exception of port based virtuals (same ip/name different port). Where exactly are you having trouble? And are you using 3.2.2 or 4? > I really think that TOMCAT is OK for testing purposes. Trust me - for > complex configurations it sucks. Again, what sort of configuration do you need? The best thing about open source is that if you need something that isn't there, you're free to add it. let me know what your problem is with virtuals and we'll see if we can work it out. cheers dim
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Krishna Muthyala
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Nick Stoianov
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Milt Epstein
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Nick Stoianov
- So what *IS* available? <Formerly Tomcat SU... howler
- RE: TOMCAT SUCKS Todd D. VanderVeen
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Dmitri Colebatch
- FIRST POST - Servlet installation problem Clifford P. Helsel
- Re: FIRST POST - Servlet installation problem Peter Davison
- RE: FIRST POST - Servlet installation problem Clifford P. Helsel
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS kevin ritter
- RE: TOMCAT SUCKS Arnold Shore
- RE: TOMCAT SUCKS Milt Epstein
- AW: TOMCAT SUCKS // what lb problem? plz clarify Nico Wieland
- Re: TOMCAT SUCKS Peter Mutsaers
- RE: JRUN really SUCKS (was TOMCAT SUCKS) Arnold Shore
- doclet extension msew
- Re: doclet extension Dmitri Colebatch
- RE: JRUN really SUCKS (was TOMCAT SUCKS) Frans Thamura
- tomcat book Dmitri Colebatch
