For a relatively simple project, where you just need source code control (with branches,etc), how about RCS? - I've used it for the last 5 years, even for code I've developed on my own (I looked at CVS but, at the time, anyway, RCS was a lot easier to use).
I believe CVS is just an interface on top of RCS which is meant to help when you need to keep track of the binaries as well, but it takes longer to learn... Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Samuel Rochas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:33 PM Subject: Re: CVS > Bonjour, > > Laurent Michenaud wrote: > > > > We prefer to use cvs rather than Ms SafeSource. > That _is_ a good decision! > > > > > - What's better ? a repository for each project or a module for > > each project ? > I prefer one module for each project. > > > - Is it a good idea to use CVS for binary files ? i was thinking > > about class files, and all the jpeg/gif files... > It is usefull to have every not generated files in CVS. A new developper > will only need to checkout the project to have anything he needs. The > file generated while compiling, and all generated file should not be > included in CVS. > > > - I think we will need differents branches : > Maybe it is a bit too much, you need something simple for the developper > too (CVS is a help). I find their use something tricky and we don't use > them often. > > Slts > Samuel Rochas > -- > SWIPe Software Engineering & Project Management GmbH > > Solutions with Individual Profile > > Web: http://www.swipe.de > > -- > To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
