I understand what you're trying to say. Can you tell me the fundamental difference between "jk" and "jk2".
I just read on this list that in the current release of "mod_webapp" there is an additional hit in performance for static pages as well since it has to go to TC then to Apache for static content serving...yuk. Anthony > >>With a little planning before you develop your > >>applications, > >>you can have Tomcat serve dynamic content on one IP address while Apache > >>serves static content on another IP address. > > > >What connector...jk, jk2 or warp??? > >What are the advantages of using warp over jk/jk2 (besides loadbalancing). > >What are the advantages of using jk over jk2? > > No connector at all. Your dynamic pages would refer to the Apache web > server that's listening > on another IP address. For example, an "index.jsp" page served by the > HTTP connector of > Tomcat would contain a reference to an image served by Apache by putting > the fully qualified > hostname in the href: <img > src="http://my.apache.server/images/myimage.jpeg"> > > Pascal -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Troubles with the list: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
