>Don't take me as a definitive source as I'm not a commiter (or >even a developer) but I believe there is work to make the RPMs >for tomcat4 more FHS compliant. There is also some debate as >to how FHS compliance should be achieved (proper directory >structure, symlinking in post-install, etc.). This is not a >small task, so the RPMs may be a bit delayed as compared to >how quickly they were posted in the past. And I do not >believe the RPMs are built via the same build tasks that >produce the other platform binaries, although that seems like >a worthwhile goal to move towards if possible. Rest assured >though that tomcat RPMs have not been dropped from the plans >as far as I've seen, and if they have been I'll start building >some. :-) >Jason
I'm working on tomcat 4.0.4 rpms, which need much more externals rpms (many from commons). That's why it take a little more times than expected >-----Original Message----- >From: Eddie Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:01 PM >To: Tomcat Users Mailing List >Subject: Distribution Policy? Where did the RPMs go? > > >Note: This is a slightly reworded posting from yesterday. I >got no response, and really wanted one. I'm reposting because >I'm assuming nobody that knew saw it - and that it's so far >down in the stack now they will not see it. > >Hi - just curious if there would be no more RPM distributions >past 4.0.3. That's the last version I see one for. I rather >like the RPMs myself and would like to see them continue. Did >someone accidentally comment out that part of the Ant script? >=) I certainly hope you all haven't decided to no longer >build RPM distributions =( Anyone know what is up? > >Thanks! > >Eddie > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
