I just posted the source for a TEST with filtering; it basically acts like cocoon, but doesn't fall into cocoon's big-brother implementation
http://www.swanked.net/xml/axalon/ It's being served off of my cable modem, so excuse speeds Jacob Hookom Comprehensive Computer Science University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Hookom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 10:20 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Xalan performance within Tomcat I just finished a Pooling implementation that works with Servlets and Filters that works to compile XSL much like JSP's... performance went from 2900ms to 100ms for formatting of xml documents. I'm still working on abstracting it to work with FOP in the same manner. If you are interested in the code, email me directly. Jacob Hookom Comprehensive Computer Science University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Einfeldt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 12:55 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: AW: Xalan performance within Tomcat As the original post says that the cpu performance was lower for the servlet application, it sounds to me as if tomcat and the servlet fight for the same restricted resource. I just can give the advice to monitor the system to see any differences. (Watch for swapping, paging, disk io, use a profiler to see what happens, trace system calls) > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Will Hartung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Juli 2002 19:21 > An: Tomcat Users List > Betreff: Re: Xalan performance within Tomcat > > > Can anyone think of anything, either java related, Tomcat > > related, xalan related, etc. that would cause the time for > > the same transform to be much much slower from within a > > servlet running in Tomcat as opposed to a test program run > > from command line. > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.375 / Virus Database: 210 - Release Date: 7/10/2002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
