Send it to the bug database. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
Guidelines are here. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/bugwritinghelp.html rls "Madere, Colin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/25/2002 05:11 PM Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: Subject: mod_jk build problems 1) There seems to be an error in the scope of the make for mod_jk where it expects to find 'libtool' in the common directory but it is in the parent directory of the common directory. (couldn't find a good place to submit this problem except here) 2) Let me prefix my problem description with some specs: Solaris 2.7 on x86 (but plan to deploy on SPARC under Solaris 2.7 and 2.8) gcc 3.2 J2SDK 1.4.1_01 Apache 2.0.43 (built from src) Tomcat 4.1 The docs at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html dont' quite seem to cover everything (you know what I mean). I build with the "--enable-jni" since it is suggested for Apache 2.0 and I get a "jk_jnicb.so" but I don't get a "mod_jk.so" as the documentation suggests. Is it correct behavior that a "mod_jk.so" NOT get built when using that build option? If so, would help if that was noted in docs. Now assuming all is well, do I assume that the rest of the docs (in regards to installation) when referring to "mod_jk.so" mean "mod_jk.so or jk_jnicb.so"? When I try to go into the build directory under 'jk' named 'Apache-2.0' (which the docs say where the resulting "mod_jk.so" is to be built) and try to do a 'make' I get an error "libtool: unrecognized option '-g' ". Any assistance would be greatly appreciated including suggestions for using other connectors if my setup suggests such a move. Colin Madere -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
