RE: mod_jk build problems

[Henri Gomez]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Veniamin Fichin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 10:27 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: mod_jk build problems
>
> Madere, Colin wrote:
>
> > The docs at
> http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html
> > dont' quite seem to cover everything (you know what I mean).

You should know that the up to date jk/jk2 documentation is not in
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/index.html (it's only a snap) but in :

http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/doc
or http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk2/doc

We works hard in JK/JK2 to provide up to date documentation and to include users feedback.

And to be able to include such feedback, we need POSITIVE returns,
including bug/fixes and experiences on the various operating systems.


>I build
> with
> > the "--enable-jni" since it is suggested for Apache 2.0 and I get a
> > "jk_jnicb.so" but I don't get a "mod_jk.so" as the documentation
> suggests.
> > Is it correct behavior that a "mod_jk.so" NOT get built when using that
> > build option? If so, would help if that was noted in docs.
>
> I faced the same behaviour. I went to the directory
> jk/native/apache-2.0/ and found a target "mod_jk.so" in Makefile.
> So just type "make mod_jk.so" and you'll get it.
>
> But yes, it is a bug, and it should be reported.

My usual question will be give more informations about :

operating system, compilers/linkers/libtool used, apache webserver version....

And as allways in ASF/OSS spirit, suggestions, bug fixes, documentations
updates are welcomed and much more profitable to community that just negative opinion like "dont' quite seem to cover everything (you know what I mean)".

Regards



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>