Actually if you want to use JDK 1.3.1 you need xerces XML parser, which lacks on LS distribution which is part of JDK 1.4.1 so no need to include it in Tomcat also...

Raj Saini wrote:

Hi,
jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14.exe does not have some librabries which
are part of the JDK 1.4.x. Download the jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12.exe as
your JDK version is 1.3.x. If you want to use the LE version download
and install the JDK 1.4.x.

Raj
Sexton, George wrote:

> The LE distribution requires JDK 1.4
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nalini [mailto:nalinisp@;yahoo.com]
> Sent: 28 October, 2002 11:54 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: tomcat 4.1.12 not starting- exception
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed jdk1.3.1_04 and made JAVA_HOME point
> to the jdk home =
> directory.
> Then I have down loaded the release version of tomcat
> 4.1.12 and unzipped =
> it. When I tried to start tomcat from the
> tomcathome\bin directory using =
> the startup command , I get the following error.
>
> Using CATALINA_BASE:
> C:\jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14
> Using CATALINA_HOME:
> C:\jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14
> Using CATALINA_TMPDIR:
> C:\jakarta-tomcat-4.1.12-LE-jdk14\temp
> Using JAVA_HOME:       C:\jdk1.3.1_04
> Exception in thread "main"
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xml/sax/Inpu=
> tSour
> ce
>         at java.lang.Class.newInstance0(Native Method)
>         at java.lang.Class.newInstance(Class.java:232)
>         at
> org.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap.main(Bootstrap.java:179)
>
> Could someone help me fix this error.
>
> --- Robert L Sowders  wrote:
>
>> Here is a nice article that might help with
>> clustering.
>>
>>
>
> http://www2.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=Tomcat
>
>> rls
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bernd Koecke
>> 10/28/2002 01:45 AM
>> Please respond to "Tomcat Users List"
>>
>>
>>        To:     Tomcat Users List
>>
>>        cc:
>>        Subject:        Re: load balancing with
>> routing with mod_jk in cluster
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it seems that you want to use mod_jk on the nodes as
>> balancer. We don't
>> use it
>> in that way. We have a load balancer in front of our
>> nodes, which has a
>> standby
>> balancer, if the first one goes down. If we want to
>> get your requested
>> behavior,
>> we had to configure this on our load balancer, not
>> on the nodes. This
>> balancer
>> knows nothing about apache, tomcat and mod_jk. So I
>> don't know how to
>> manage it
>> with mod_jk.
>>
>> I don't know how your config should work. Because if
>> N1 routes to all
>> other
>> nodes and N1 goes down, how should your client know,
>> that he had to
>> connect to
>> N2? You need some logic in front of your cluster,
>> that the clients see
>> your
>> cluster as one big server. If you want something
>> like standby or hot
>> standby you
>> must implement this in the front logic, not on the
>> nodes. And I don't know
>> if
>> this is possible with jk1.
>>
>> Why do you limit the balancing to N1? Most of the
>> work is done in your
>> servlets.
>> The balancing is not so hard, that it will bring
>> your node down. If all
>> nodes do
>> balancing its no problem, if one node goes down.
>>
>> But may be I don't understand your scenario.
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>> Alexander Piavka wrote:
>>
>>> Bernd thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>> There is one more question i have.
>>> I have 3 nodes N1,N2,N3 each runs apache and
>>
>>
>> tomcat. On node N1 i want
>>
>>> to run lb_worker1 which will route all requests
>>
>>
>> between all nodes.
>>
>>> All apache servers will send requests to this
>>
>>
>> lb_worker1.
>>
>>> On node N2 i want to run lb_worker2 which will
>>
>>
>> start routing  all
>> requests
>>
>>> between all nodes ONLY then lb_worker1 goes down.
>>> I don't know if it is possible to make this
>>
>>
>> configuration in
>>
>>> workers.properties file.
>>> As i see i on each node workers.proprerties file
>>
>>
>> should have bl_worker
>>
>>> which will route requests between bl_worker1
>>
>>
>> bl_worker2. And bl_worker1
>>
>>> should have very high lbfactor and bl_worker2 very
>>
>>
>> low:
>>
>>> worker.bl_worker.type=lb
>>>
>>
> worker.bl_worker.balanced_workers=bl_worker1,bl_worker2
>
>>> but this is probably illegal as load balancers
>>
>>
>> don't have lbfactor,
>>
>>> and balancers can't have other balancers in their
>>
>>
>> balanced_workers
>>
>>> property.
>>> Please tell me if i can make the above scenario
>>
>>
>> work.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dipl.-Inform. Bernd Koecke
>> UNIX-Entwicklung
>> Schlund+Partner AG
>> Fon: +49-721-91374-0
>> E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 2 application/octet-stream
>
>
> name=attbf0fo.dat
>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:

For additional commands, e-mail:


--
Cristian D. Romanescu
alternative: cristian at qdrei.de
mobile     : +40745133096

--- "Pauca sed matura" - Gauss' motto ---


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:tomcat-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:tomcat-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>

Reply via email to