Is it known to be buggy on Linux or just Windows? It sounds like its fine and even preferred according to some docs when using Linux/Apache 1.3. Also, I discussed load balancing and it sounds like we're using hardware load balancer so each instance of Apache will have a 1:1 map to its own Tomcat instance.
In this case, is using WARP for production purposes a bad idea? Thanks. Neal -----Original Message----- From: Lajos Moczar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:08 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat) One more point is that webapp is just plain buggy, while tried-and-true mod_jk is quite reliable. If you are hosting anything production-quality, I'd go with mod_jk every time. Lajos neal wrote: > For anyone interested I just confirmed via a book I bought from Borders that > WARP does not support Load balancing. So, for the archives ... WARP (Via > the WebApp module) does not support: > > 1. Load balancing > 2. Apache 2.0 (at least with Windows) > > And contrary to the Apache's own WebApp module site, Windows *IS* supported > for 1.3.27 usage ... and its downloadable from the site. Man, Apache should > really update this documentation ... I just waisted the majorty of a day > figuring this stuff out (anyone from apache listening out there??). ;-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:58 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat) > > > Well, I re-installed an older version of Apache (1.3.27) and WARP via > mod_webApp seems to work fine now....and that was on Windows! So, I guess > the compatability issue was with Apache 2.0. Hmm. That sucks. > > By the way, it was mentioned on this thread that mod_jk supports load > balancing. Is that to say that WARP won't work in a multiple-host > scenario?!?! :( > > Thanks > Neal > > > -----Original Message----- > From: neal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:04 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat) > > > Really?!?! > > But I downloaded it from the win32 archives on the apache site > (http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/archives/v4.0.1/bin/win > 32/). It even came with the libapr.dll - the library file compile as a > windows DLL. Perhaps its just not compatible with Apache 2? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:50 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat) > > > > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, neal wrote: > > >>Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:38:55 -0800 >>From: neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: RE: WARP (Apache<->Tomcat) >> >>This is totally screwey! >> >>Does WARP work on Windows or not?!?! >> > > > My understanding is "not". > > Craig > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- galatea.com Cocoon training, consulting & support -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
