Howdy, > I know what you mean, but maybe he doesn't really need what log4j >offers in better ways than jdk1.4 > I use it for very simple logging and have no problems with it.
You could be right. If his use case is very simple and will never grow more complex. One thing to keep in mind though, is performance (time and memory consumption), of both logging and "not logging" ie issuing logging statements to a logger that's configured not to output anything above a certain threshold. Our internal benchmarks show log4j to be superior in both time and memory performance, even using very plain (1 log file) configurations. That alone can affect which implementation to use. Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
