My opinion is you choose whatever you like. Obviously jdk1.4 logging API is
for jdk 1.4. commons-logging is a good API only if you use it as a logger
not a wrapper of another logger.


Regards,
 
 
PQ
 
"This Guy Thinks He Knows Everything"
"This Guy Thinks He Knows What He Is Doing"

-----Original Message-----
From: Felipe Schnack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: February 19, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Jacob Kjome
Cc: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Re[2]: Best Logging practices

  What are the real advantages os log4j? Everybody says it's better, but
no one says why :-)
  just curious

On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 16:16, Jacob Kjome wrote:
> Hello Mike,
> 
> If by "newer and more refined" you mean "not compatible with jdk's
> previous to Sun's 1.4 jdk with fewer features than Log4j", then you
> are absolutely correct.
> 
> Seriously, Log4j is far more capable than JDK1.4 logging and is
> independent of your favorite JDK.  And don't bother with
> commons-logging unless you like debugging weird classloader issues and
> want lowest-common-denominator functionality.
> 
> http://qos.ch/logging/thinkAgain.html
> 
> Jake
> 
> Wednesday, February 19, 2003, 9:01:38 AM, you wrote:
> 
> AM> Can you give me the lay of the land regarding log4j?  I was under the
> AM> impression that java.util.logging was the way to go for the future.
It
> AM> (java.util.logging) appears to be a newer, more refined package.
> 
> AM> -----Original Message-----
> AM> From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> AM> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 8:19 AM
> AM> To: Tomcat Users List
> AM> Subject: RE: Best Logging practices
> 
> 
> AM> Howdy,
> AM> Listen to Jacob -- I wish more people did what he recommended in his
> AM> post.  Also use log4j. ;)
> 
> 
> AM> Yoav Shapira
> AM> Millennium ChemInformatics
> 
> 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Manavendra Gupta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:30 PM
> >>To: Tomcat Users List
> >>Subject: Best Logging practices
> >>
> >>Any pointers/thoughts about web application logging practices? You
> >>generally
> >>see almost each individual with different opinion about this (from
> AM> logging
> >>into the system temporary directory to inside WEB-INF).
> >>
> >>Are there any best practices for this?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Manav.
> >>
> >>
> >>---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> AM> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
> AM> communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
> AM> proprietary and/or privileged.  This e-mail is intended only for the
> AM> individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied,
> AM> printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an)
> AM> intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your
> AM> computer system and notify the sender.  Thank you.
> 
> 
> AM> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> AM> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AM> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> AM> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> AM> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> AM> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
>  Jacob                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
-- 

Felipe Schnack
Analista de Sistemas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cel.: (51)91287530
Linux Counter #281893

Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis
http://www.ritterdosreis.br
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fone/Fax.: (51)32303341


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to