guys, there seems to be a problem here for me with the database implementation. After all the discussion i was all set to implemenent the database as a FILESYSTEM only but my BOSS insists that ORACLE shoudl be implemented. Can somebody of u enlighten me with the SITES and README files about impplementing ORACLE under TOMCAT umbrella and what could be the DRIVERS i need to know before i plunge into the deep sea of ORACLE implementation. some of the drivers suggested are the ones made by DATATAKE, JBOSS (i guess, i may be wrong)or the default drivers which come up with the ORACLE.
Comments are really awaited !
Swapneel Dange 505-642-4126 http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~sdange
From: "Mike Jackson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: JDBC & ORACLE implementation ! Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:20:31 -0800
SQLPlus is part of oracle. You can't do sqlplus without oracle.
--mikej -=----- mike jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Swapneel Dange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JDBC & ORACLE implementation !
>
>
> hey CHONG , PENG !
>
> i think i have really given up the idea of putting up ORACKLE for my
> support. after all this discussion, i just think that there i sno urgent
> need for me to take up a HUMONGOUS taks of using ORACLE and i
> guess i will
> IMPLEMENT the SQLPLUS or the FILESYSTEM as my alternatives to the
> DATABASE
> application.
>
> but in the end i would really like to know as to between SQLPLUS or
> FILESYSTEM, which will be convinient for me to HANDLE string stripping ,
> string comparison and all that stuff ! ( BTW, i have really started
> implementing the FILESYSTEM to a good level )
>
> do commment about this !
>
> Swapneel Dange
> 505-642-4126
> http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~sdange
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Chong Yu Meng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: JDBC & ORACLE implementation !
> >Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:06:31 +0800
> >
> >I think if you take Oracle installation, configuration and
> maintenance out
> >of the picture, you definitely have a much more workable plan. I
> agree with
> >Peter, in that designing the tables and application logic are
> going to be
> >tough. I once wrote a servlet that processed CDR data from a
> Cisco switch,
> >and I spent a lot of time getting the logic just right. If I
> understand you
> >correctly, Swapneel, you need the database for storage only,
> correct ? Are
> >you planning to use the Oracle text indexer, or are you
> implementing that
> >yourself?
> >
> >One last thing : JDBC may take you a shorter time to learn than
> the 2 weeks
> >I put down in an earlier email. On reflection, that is probably
> padding too
> >much, but I recommend that you do not underestimate the time
> taken to get
> >the JDBC connection going, especially for Oracle. I've had problems with
> >8.1.5 before and had to resort to DataDirect drivers. 8.1.7
> seems to be ok,
> >though.
> >
> >Regards,
> >chong
> >
> >
> >Peter Lin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>overall, using JDBC with Tomcat is the easy part. Deciding how to
> >>implement your tables and application logic will be the hard
> part. If your
> >>data is not normalized and doesn't need to be, then the first thing you
> >>should look into is statistical analysis of text. there are
> several well
> >>tested algo's for doing this type of processing. Unfortunately I don't
> >>know the name of the algo's. I worked on integrating personalization
> >>applications a couple years back relating to filtering news.
> >>
> >>If your needs aren't too complex, it shouldn't take too long to
> implement
> >>some form of statistical analysis. Using file system to store
> the entire
> >>text doesn't necessarily mean you can't store the text summaries in
> >>Oracle. Google for related topics and you should be to find
> some examples.
> >>If you're needs are more complex, you'll need to look into
> grammar based
> >>parsing, which is a slow process. Most of the comparison
> between grammar
> >>based and statistical parsing has shown that statistical is more
> >>effective. hope that helps.
> >>
> >>peter
> >>
> >>Swapneel Dange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:hey peter, mike & chong !
> >>
> >>so if i stay with a small thing like SQLPLUS, the JDBC
> connectivity wont
> >>be a tough thing to do as compared to the ORACLE
> implementation. right ?
> >>because in last few days after consulting with some people
> in-house here,
> >>i am thinking over the OPTION of SQLPLUS.
> >>
> >>do commment on this !
> >>
> >>Swapneel Dange
> >>505-642-4126
> >>http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~sdange
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
