Howdy, I agree. Use tomcat standalone at least for now. It's the KISS principle. Any complications will have a negative effect.
Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-----Original Message----- >From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 4:32 AM >To: Tomcat User List >Subject: Convenience on using apache+tomcat vs tomcat alone > >Hello All, >I'm in the process of setting up a real-production server to serve a >dynamic >jsp driven website. >And I'm facing the decision if using tomcat alone or apache+jk+tomcat. > >From what I've read on the ML I think that is best to use tomcat alone >because I've got a completely dynamic web site, with just a few graphical >images and not static html pages... so I think that the double step of >apache that ask tomcat to give me a response is just a performance >degradation... > >Are my thoughts right? or am I missing something? > >or maybe using JK2 instead of JK will give me benefetis even if the site is >fully jsp driven? > >Thank you all >Simone > >------------------------- >Simone Chiaretta >www.piyosailing.com/S >Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
