Hi there, I guess it's fine if you are using one tomcat instance; You will need webserver(s) with mod jk/jk2 for loadbalancing and failover when using multiple instances
Kwong. -----Original Message----- From: Simone Chiaretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 13 March 2003 20:32 To: Tomcat User List Subject: Convenience on using apache+tomcat vs tomcat alone Hello All, I'm in the process of setting up a real-production server to serve a dynamic jsp driven website. And I'm facing the decision if using tomcat alone or apache+jk+tomcat. >From what I've read on the ML I think that is best to use tomcat alone because I've got a completely dynamic web site, with just a few graphical images and not static html pages... so I think that the double step of apache that ask tomcat to give me a response is just a performance degradation... Are my thoughts right? or am I missing something? or maybe using JK2 instead of JK will give me benefetis even if the site is fully jsp driven? Thank you all Simone ------------------------- Simone Chiaretta www.piyosailing.com/S Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------- Powered by telstra.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
