Agreed, my mistake. I hadn't had my caffeine yet. My brain was thinking "its open source".


John

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 22:01:35 -0700, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


"John Turner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

#2 because its free and based on the GPL. 'Nuf said.



Urm, it is actually based on the Apache-License (similar to the BSD
License), which is much less restrictive than GPL. If Tomcat were GPL, I'd
never let my firm use it, much less be a Tomcat developer.


John

On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 19:29:51 +0800, Cui Xiaojing-a13339
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> We plan to develop two web applications. Now we have two solutions for
> them and only one solution could be chosen for the two applications,
that
> means the two application must use same solution.
>
> The two solutions are:
> 1. Oracle JServer+Oracle 9iAS 1.0.2
> 2. Tomcat + Apache
>
> Could you please give some suggestion about which solution is better?
>
> Thanks&Regards,
> Xiaojing
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



--
Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to