Thanks Simon. It's just odd that it's settings don't override what's in server.xml or that you can set the same thing both places. I could see using jk2.properties for extended properties specific to each channel type but things like host and port that are specified in the server.xml are just confusing to repeat in jk2.properties. Maybe the best approach is, as you say, to just comment the file but leave it there to avoid the warning. Thanks!
Jamey James Courtney InPhonic, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Pabst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:07 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: jk2.properties I think you can leave all entries commented when you're using channelSockets, however when you use channelUnix (fast unix sockets) you need some entries in jk2.properties. (see http://www.pubbitch.org/jboss/mod_jk2.html for details) At 14:28 10.07.2003 -0700, you wrote: >Under what circumstances are the properties set in this file relevant? At >least for channelSocket they seem to at best be overridden by those in the >server.xml for the corresponding CoyoteConnector. I'm using Tomcat 4.1.24. > >Jamey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
