No, I think you mentioned that. :)

-e

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:

> Dang, I forgot to mention that we have 6 machines set up like this (or
> to be set up like this).
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric J. Pinnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:18 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: Re: CiscoLB jk2 problem
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is why you want to spread your application across two or more
> > tomcats.  I'm not sure if you can tweak the behavior of the
> > error because
> > what you are getting is indeed a internal server error.  If
> > you are going
> > to load balance you should try to load balance all the way
> > down the stack.
> >
> > Try giving each apache two or more tomcats to send sessions
> > too.  JK2 will
> > see that tomcat A is down and move to tomcat B.  Your application
> > monitoring software should then kick of an alert to notify
> > someone that a
> > tomcat is down and might need human intervention.
> >
> > -e
> >
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Angus Mezick wrote:
> >
> > > I need to let apache fail nicely when a tomcat instance has crashed,
> > > been stopped or is being restarted.  Right now this is what happens
> > > through the jk2 connector:
> > > I stop apache:            10061 - Connection refused
> > > I stop one tomcat webapp: HTTP Status 404
> > > I stop the tomcat server: 500 Internal Server Error
> > > Directly to tomcat:
> > > I stop apache:            Nothing happens, not using it :)
> > > I stop one tomcat webapp: HTTP Status 404
> > > I stop the tomcat server: 10061 - Connection refused
> > >
> > > I would like to see apache return 10061 - Connection
> > refused when I stop
> > > tomcat instead of error 500 because this can cause problems with the
> > > cisco load balancer noticing that a server has dropped out
> > of the loop.
> > > We are doing a simple one apache <-> one tomcat setup on 6
> > machines that
> > > are HW load balanced.  Each tomcat has multiple webapps
> > each accessible
> > > through a virtual host.  Do I just need to switch to JNI?
> > >
> > >
> > > My current workers2.properties:
> > >  only at beginnin. In production uncomment it out
> > > [logger.apache2]
> > > level=DEBUG
> > >
> > > [shm]
> > > file=/ApacheGroup/Apache2/logs/jk2.shm
> > > size=1048576
> > >
> > > # Example socket channel, override port and host.
> > > [channel.socket:localhost:8009]
> > > port=8009
> > > host=wbdevweb5.guidestar.net
> > >
> > > # define the worker
> > > [ajp13:localhost:8009]
> > > channel=channel.socket:localhost:8009
> > >
> > > # define the worker
> > > [status:status]
> > >
> > > # Uri mapping
> > > [uri:/jkstatus/*]
> > > worker=status:status
> > >
> > > # Uri mapping
> > > [uri:wwwwbdevweb5.guidestar.net/*]
> > > worker=ajp13:localhost:8009
> > > [uri:wwwwbdevweb5/*]
> > > worker=ajp13:localhost:8009
> > >
> > >
> > > My jk2.properties:
> > >
> > > handler.list=channelSocket,request
> > > channelSocket.port=8009
> > >
> > > --Angus
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to