(2011/03/01 7:17), Jamie Nguyen wrote: > Tetsuo Handa wrote: >> Sorry for taking so long time for translation. >> >> I'm currently trying to solve lockdep warning caused by garbage collector's >> lazy algorithm. Currently garbage collector waits until /proc/ccs/ interface >> is >> close()d, but that causes lockdep to complain about leaving the kernel with >> lock held. I proposed a solution which I'm using for 1.x, but the solution >> was >> not accepted for 2.x. Thus, I'm trying to start garbage collection before >> /proc/ccs/ interface is close()d. As of revision 4663, I think I'm >> approaching >> a working solution, but I need to test more. > > No rush. We already have usable documentation in place anyway, so > 1.8-tmp is low priority. Currently, I have linked to 1.8-tmp in the > Arch Wiki (with a suitable warning) so that users can make use of it > before it is completely done.
That's very nice. Thank you. Every time I open the project web you greatly contributed, I found it useful and familiar. I'm so sure that every TOMOYO users feel the same. Personally, I would like to credit your name somewhere in the project page as an important contributor. I have reflected the explanation of project introduction to various places I maintain. http://tomoyo.sourceforge.net/ http://elinux.org/TomoyoLinux#Overview http://wiki.debian.org/Tomoyo http://freshmeat.net/projects/tomoyo (should be updated soon) http://en.sourceforge.jp/projects/tomoyo/ and some more sites I have forgotten. :-) >> By the way, I posted a question regarding kernel module and Ubuntu's support >> policy. >> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+question/145601 >> Although I didn't get an authoritative answer, I got a positive response for >> posting bug reports on kernels running with kernel modules which are not >> included in Ubuntu's pristine kernel. Therefore, although AKARI is not >> authorized by NTT DATA Corporation, I'm thinking that it might worth >> referring/introducing/suggesting AKARI at >> http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/1.8-tmp/chapter-3.html so that we can help those >> who are worrying about (or giving up) distributor's support by reading >> "TOMOYO >> Linux requires the installation of a seperate Linux kernel from the one >> provided by your distribution" part. >> >> What do you think? > > It would be a good idea to mention AKARI as it is very useful. > > In the Arch Wiki page that I wrote, I recommend AKARI for custom > kernels (many Arch users like to use kernels patched with Con Kolivas > patch set, pf-kernel or many other patches). I doubt many would have > heard of AKARI unless it was mentioned in the wiki page, so giving it > more exposure in the official documentation would certainly be > beneficial, especially for users in other distributions that want/need > to use the default distribution kernel. I totally agree with Jamie. I feel AKARI is like a twin of TOMOYO who is much more friendly. Some people might remain using AKARI, but that should not be a problem, because I believe the most important thing for the project is to be useful for the users. Best regards, Toshiharu Harada _______________________________________________ tomoyo-dev-en mailing list tomoyo-dev-en@lists.sourceforge.jp http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-dev-en
