Jamie Nguyen wrote: > It would be a good idea to mention AKARI as it is very useful.
OK. Please add to 1.8-tmp/chapter-3.html.en and documentation.html.en . I thought something like http://sourceforge.jp/projects/tomoyo/svn/view?view=rev&revision=4673 and noticed that users might want advantage/disadvantage comparison in a table format (like we do in AKARI's comparison.html ) rather than plain text blocks (like we do in TOMOYO's documentation.html ). > In the Arch Wiki page that I wrote, I recommend AKARI for custom > kernels (many Arch users like to use kernels patched with Con Kolivas > patch set, pf-kernel or many other patches). I know a Japanese TOMOYO user who applied CKS patch (or "thanks for all the fish" patches?) + {IOP/GLANTANK} patch + TOMOYO patch on the vanilla kernel in 2006. ;-) By the way, please update "Policy sample" link in the Arch Wiki page because I added TOMOYO 1.8 policy on CentOS 5.5 and moved old policy to old/ directory. _______________________________________________ tomoyo-dev-en mailing list tomoyo-dev-en@lists.sourceforge.jp http://lists.sourceforge.jp/mailman/listinfo/tomoyo-dev-en
