Maybe it isn't a Tulip, I think that some of the LNE100TX cards use a different chipset? -Tom
On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Aaron Bush wrote: > Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 13:38:35 -0400 > From: Aaron Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [tomsrtbt] support for Linksys LNE100TX/Tulip? > > Looking at /proc/pci i see that i have a: > Lite-on Unknown device (rev 37). > Vendor id=11ad. > Device id=c115. > I/O at 0xd800 > Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xffcfff00 > > My BIOS shows the card at IRQ 10. > > > I have tried this at the boot prompt: > 1) zImage ether=0,0,eth0 > (results with nothing in dmesg for eth0 and no eth0 device) > > 2) zImage ether=0,0,0,eth0 > (results with nothing in dmesg for eth0 and no eth0 device) > > 3) zImage ether=0,0xd800,eth0 > (results with "eth0: EtherExpress at 0xd800, rejected: invalid address > ffffffffffff" and no eth0 device) > > 4) zImage ether=10,0xd800,eth0 > (results with "eth0: EtherExpress at 0xd800, rejected: invalid address > ffffffffffff" and no eth0 device) > > What is the correct ether= argument to get the Kernel to recognize my > card? > > Thanks, > -ab > > Tom Oehser wrote: > > > > Tulip is hard-compiled into the kernel. -Tom >
