On 11/20/08 09:32, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> If I understand things correctly, the codebase for /opt/SUNWspro/bin/fbe
>>> and /usr/ccs/bin/as is the same, and fixes to the first will eventually
>>> make it to the second (which is regularly used by GCC, at least on SPARC;
>>> the x86 as is largely unusable for GCC).
>> Yes, that is correct.
> 
> Fine.  Two questions here:
> 
> * Are there plans to open at least the assembler codebase?  This might help
>   to faster get to the root of problems.

Rainer,

I apologize if this is a non-helpful answer - there's an expectation 
that it may be opened in the future, but there is no specific 
requirement/timetable to do so.


> * In the past, it used to be possible to build GCC on x86 with the Sun as
>   at least for the 32-bit case.  When I recently tried this, I failed
>   miserably.  This may well be a GCC bug (I'll check) or a workaround might
>   be possible.  For the 64-bit case, it was never possible to use anything
>   but GNU as, although I filed some bug reports early during the
>   CodeSourcery port to Solaris 10/x64.  Would it be worthwhile to file bugs
>   to get this fixed?  Recent Sun Studio Express release notes seem to
>   indicate that fbe has been updated to be more gas compatible lately.
>   Alternatively, one could declare defeat and just use gas with GCC.

I'd request that you submit the bugs. I maintain as-on-Sparc so I can't 
speak to the priority that the as-on-x86 bugs would receive. But I can 
say that it's a great help to have them reported.

Cheers,

Mark



> Regards.
>       Rainer
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
> _______________________________________________
> tools-compilers mailing list
> tools-compilers at opensolaris.org

Reply via email to