On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 15:08 -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> Commentary is encouraged.
I'm delighted to hear about this result. Thanks for running your
evaluation process in such an open and participatory manner.
> * Git and Mercurial are close in many aspects. Both are lightweight,
> and fast. Both, unfortunately, do not currently have a rename
> operation that preserves history.
As you may know, I've been running a survey of Mercurial users lately.
Tracking renames properly is around #1 on people's priority lists, so
you're not alone.
> The DSCM to be used for OpenSolaris projects (like the large ON
> consolidation) has to work with the infrastructure for code review
> and release engineering that OpenSolaris has and will have.
I'll be happy to help with advocating any requirements you have or
providing whatever technical assistance you may need when integrating
Mercurial into your infrastructure.
Cheers,
<b
--
Bryan O'Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
tools-discuss mailing list
tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
