* Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-02 15:01]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > >* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-02 12:24]: > >>>>>>>"stevel" == Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>stevel> what about a changegroup hook that only fires if there are > >>stevel> >10 changesets incoming, and a changeset hook that fires if > >>stevel> there are <=10? > >> > >>I don't think an adaptive approach is appropriate here. > >> > >>.... > >> > >>I'd rather see a single notification email, which always contains the > >>same level of detail. The email could include one or more links to > >>pages with additional information.[2] > > > > Does your changesets > N format differ appreciably for changesets = 1? > > A single message format is definitely appealing. > > There are a few differences: > > The notification format for the 'Changesets > N' case drops the > 'Revision:' field since it encompasses multiple revisions. > The log msg will only log the most recent message, and will also contain > a note to the effect of "This changegroup encompassed XX changesets". > I'm also happy to change this something like "Changesets Included: XX" > if that will make it more parse-able.
So if you had Latest revision: Total changesets: the format would be same for = 1, > 1. Acceptable? - Stephen -- Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/ _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
