>>>>> "Danek" == Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> It depends on whether the tools need to evolve with the gate itself. Jim> Jim> If not -- if they're really indendent of the gate -- then keeping Jim> them in a separate repository sounds like a fine idea. Danek> I don't see that they need to evolve with the gate, no. They're Danek> related, but not intimately (no "Consolidation Private" Danek> interfaces are used, to my knowledge). That's the one area that's got me concerned. We could conceivably produce some utility code that's used by both the ON and gk code (e.g., for dealing with the opensolaris.org user database). I don't think that's necessarily an argument for putting the gk code in the ON repo, but I do think we need to watch out for it. If such utility code does get written, we'll need a plan for managing changes. mike _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
