1) 1 changegroup == 1 changeset == multiple bugs
This is basically what we have now... multiple bugs fixed,
integrated as one changeset, with one changeset per
putback/changegroup
i.e.: prior to doing a 'hg push', all commits are
redelget'd into one
2) 1 changegroup == multiple changesets, 1 bug/changeset
This is a more rigorous (IMHO) option where each bugfix
is done as one 'hg commit', with the actual putback
(nay, changegroup) being multiple commits
This influences how we want to have things like 'deltachk' run. i.e.:
what should they be enforcing/allowing.
Option #2 makes the most sense to me. If that is the case, what should deltachk be checking (if anything? Should it just go away?)
cheers, steve -- stephen lau // [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 650.786.0845 | http://whacked.net opensolaris // solaris kernel development _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
