On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 08:59:01AM -0500, Richard Lowe wrote: > If an ideal would be unrelated fixes going back as separate changesets > (even if in the same changegroup), does that leave us with deltachk > having no purpose, as multiple deltas per-putback would be under that > logic acceptable with Hg?
For the exact equivalent of deltachk, yes, I think it's no longer useful. However, we still need to make sure that no bug is present in more than one changeset comment in a changegroup. (Note that really is the situation we have now, only wx doesn't check for it -- multiple deltas is allowed now, but no bugfix may be spread across multiple deltas.) Danek _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
