> I agree with you on that ON is not wedded to warlock, IMHO we should > focus on improving warlock to refine its interfaces and not on > converging warlock to lock_lint or something.
I still object to this. Unless there is actually a different intended purpose for the two tools, having warlock and lock_lint diverge further will just create confusion and limit our return on investment (e.g., since customers of lock_lint will not benefit from warlock enhancements). If warlock is considered the better codebase to evolve, then please evolve it to subsume lock_lint (which could then be EOL'd with a reasonable transition plan to warlock) -- but please don't leave lock_lint adrift. -- meem _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
