On 2007-04-30 08:52, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Gupta writes: > > Draft 0.3 vim proposal. > > > > http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=df6hcjb2_10f934gh > > > > Please let me know if you need edit access. > > Are you trying to write a full case or a fast-track? If it's the > latter (integrating vim alone without name conflicts sounds like a > fast-track to me), then there's one small problem with the text: it's > too long. Brevity is the soul of a fast-track. Pare away the bits > (such as historical notes) that are not needed. > > On the text itself: > > > Vim is currently considered the most modern and advanced version of vi > > available. Because of this it has become the standard version of vi for > > many of the Open Source Operating Systems that are shipping today. > > Does this mean just Linux? If so, say so. (I thought *BSD shipped > with both 'standard' vi and vim ...)
FWIW, The base system of FreeBSD contains nvi. vim is also available too, as a thirdparty package, through the FreeBSD "Ports Collection". _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
