Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [adding tools-discuss to Cc, since this is a general DTS-ish thing]
> * Richard Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-30 20:33]: >> Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Patrick Finch wrote: >> >> I'd suggest something relating to X server problems. I seldom have >> >> problems with Solaris, but I very often have X.org conf problems with >> >> Linux distros. >> > >> > In the current bugtraq db, X problems go under solaris/xserver/* >> > (which I've long wanted to rename to solaris/x11/*, since it covers >> > more than just the server, and having solaris/xserver/server and >> > solaris/xserver/client_libs just seem silly). >> >> The tricky bit, for these purposes, is that only Indiana bugs should >> be tracked in whatever set up you devise, generic bugs in opensolaris >> components *must* continue to live in the correct places >> (bugtraq/b.o.o, right now). > > I'm not sure so of that, if we select a community DTS. I would expect > RTI and related processes to be adjusted for two defect systems. > Well, as I've said previously, I firmly believe that two disparate systems is a recipe for chaos, and will work out badly. I had thought your original plan was a slow migration to a single system, such as to avoid that to the largest degree possible. We can't run two disconnected systems side by side indefinitely without causing more problems that we fix. -- Rich _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list [email protected]
