This sounds more like a SMI issue than an OGB one, since the SCA policy is one invented by SMI for its own use; I am not sure what you wish the OGB to do here - or if the OGB can do it. Can you tell us more?
-John On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Shawn Walker <swal...@opensolaris.org> wrote: > Alan Burlison wrote: >> >> Shawn Walker wrote: >>> >>> While we require SCAs for those that contribute patches to pkg(5), that >>> is not true of all os.org repositories. >> >> No, that's wrong. All contributions to any repository that we host must >> to be covered by an SCA, or by virtue of Sun employment. >> >> http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/lead_reference > > Then the policy is wrong as well and seems questionable at best. Not a > problem for you Alan, but... > > Not all code used everywhere on os.org even *needs* an SCA. > > And it seems like there is a good chance this policy is not being enforced > 100%. > > Can we please fix this policy? _______________________________________________ tools-discuss mailing list tools-discuss@opensolaris.org
