> Of course, maybe I misunderstood what you were asking for...

No, no, I thank your response.

Because I leaned about MacOS X which uses Objective-C's
dynamism thoroughly (so, extending class dynamically, or
method object independant from any class...), I'm not so
desperate.

> This doesn't sound unreasonable.  Part of my job is
> figuring out the right relocations to generate to
> get a specific effect in the linker.  I need to
> worry about comdat and thread-local-data, and
> similar "edge cases".  It might make my job easier
> if we had a more general purpose feature for this
> kind of thing.  Rather than relying on a large
> enumeration of different kinds of possible relocations.

Mmm... I'm not a linker expert in fact.

Could you describe how the extension syntax of C for such a
case do you think should be? (using `...@const' or something...).

---
Mikiya Matsuzaka



Reply via email to