> Of course, maybe I misunderstood what you were asking for... No, no, I thank your response.
Because I leaned about MacOS X which uses Objective-C's dynamism thoroughly (so, extending class dynamically, or method object independant from any class...), I'm not so desperate. > This doesn't sound unreasonable. Part of my job is > figuring out the right relocations to generate to > get a specific effect in the linker. I need to > worry about comdat and thread-local-data, and > similar "edge cases". It might make my job easier > if we had a more general purpose feature for this > kind of thing. Rather than relying on a large > enumeration of different kinds of possible relocations. Mmm... I'm not a linker expert in fact. Could you describe how the extension syntax of C for such a case do you think should be? (using `...@const' or something...). --- Mikiya Matsuzaka