Interesting. I found this reference: http://developer.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/MachORuntime/index.html
Does that page describe the "dynamic" features you are talking about? If not, do you have pointers to a description of the features you're talking about? --chris Mikiya Matsuzaka wrote: >> Of course, maybe I misunderstood what you were asking for... > > No, no, I thank your response. > > Because I leaned about MacOS X which uses Objective-C's > dynamism thoroughly (so, extending class dynamically, or > method object independant from any class...), I'm not so > desperate. > >> This doesn't sound unreasonable. Part of my job is >> figuring out the right relocations to generate to >> get a specific effect in the linker. I need to >> worry about comdat and thread-local-data, and >> similar "edge cases". It might make my job easier >> if we had a more general purpose feature for this >> kind of thing. Rather than relying on a large >> enumeration of different kinds of possible relocations. > > Mmm... I'm not a linker expert in fact. > > Could you describe how the extension syntax of C for such a > case do you think should be? (using `...@const' or something...). > > --- > Mikiya Matsuzaka > > > _______________________________________________ > tools-linking mailing list > tools-linking at opensolaris.org
