stable as in "stable versions"? On 11/3/07, River Tarnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello, > > to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it. so, if > anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name > somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good > place). the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per project, > but that isn't set in stone. more maintainers is probably better. > > * do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers > without asking them. don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking > with the tool's author. > > * you can list people without toolserver accounts. > > this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks > hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't > add it. similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these > should go to hemlock instead). > > if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer be > owned by the original author; the development team members will each have > equal responsibility in their development. > > the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still > in discussion. (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if > you have any suggestions). > > - river. > > _______________________________________________ > Toolserver-l mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l > > >
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
