Oh, stable as opposed to instable. Never mind. On 11/3/07, James Hare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > stable as in "stable versions"? > > On 11/3/07, River Tarnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hello, > > > > to justify buying a stable server, we need people willing to use it. so, if > > anyone is interested in maintaining stable tools, please add your name > > somewhere (i suggest [[m:Toolserver/Stable server/Candidates]] as a good > > place). the initial proposal suggested at least two maintainers per > > project, > > but that isn't set in stone. more maintainers is probably better. > > > > * do not add other people's projects, or list other people as maintainers > > without asking them. don't add yourself as a maintainer without checking > > with the tool's author. > > > > * you can list people without toolserver accounts. > > > > this is only for stable, established projects; if your project still breaks > > hemlock once a week, or you aren't certain it's working well, please don't > > add it. similarly, new project proposals will not be considered (these > > should go to hemlock instead). > > > > if the stable server goes ahead, projects which are accepted will no longer > > be > > owned by the original author; the development team members will each have > > equal responsibility in their development. > > > > the exact configuration of the stable server, how it'll work, etc. are still > > in discussion. (please feel free to edit [[m:Toolserver/Stable server]] if > > you have any suggestions). > > > > - river. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Toolserver-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
