Adam Dodek Michalik wrote: > 2007/11/7, MinuteElectron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> My appologies, I didn't realise that this was indeed official. However I >> still maintain that it would be better to consolidate everything into >> one Toolserver rather than have many different projects with no >> coordination. >> > > Well, I've just logged up to the "official" toolserver. The time > between I typed my password and the prompt showed up was about 15 > seconds. I took a quick look at `uptime` to check the load - it was > high indeed, i got following output (after 5 seconds since pressing > enter): > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime > 17:45:59 up 40 days, 18:21, 26 users, load average: 229.20, 238.11, 198.69 > > Pretty high, isn't it? If only it was uptime... Then, I did the same > with Polish toolserver. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ uptime > 17:25:02 up 241 days, 20:41, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > Nice, isn't it? Every time I log there in, I'm sure I'll get enough CPU time. > > And, "we don't need no coordination" :) So far, our collaboration has > been in good state. > > Perhaps if you combined your resources into one toolserver all users would be able to share these CPU cycles, rather than users having to decide whether to use the one with more human resource tools (i.e. JIRA, FishEye etc.) or one with more availability. That way users can get the best of both worlds.
MinuteElectron. _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
