> But what when individual tools break? Which ones are important enough > to try and keep running (even when people leave).
Wasn't that the point of the stable server? Having the all important tools on a stable server, and with at least two developers. So if someone leaves the tool doesn't die. - Chris On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Finne Boonen<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 12:25, Daniel Kinzler<[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi all >> >> during wikimedia germany's brithday party yesterday, I was asked to look into >> improving the communication between toolserver folks and the wiki communities >> using the toolserver. We have become an important part of their >> infrastructure, >> and when things break, they notice - but often don't know who to ask about >> it. > > Are you talking about toolserver breaking as a whole or individual > tools breaking? > > The first can indeed be covered by blogs/signpost/Aude's interview. > But what when individual tools break? Which ones are important enough > to try and keep running (even when people leave). > > henna > > > -- > "Maybe you knew early on that your track went from point A to B, but > unlike you I wasn't given a map at birth!" Alyssa, "Chasing Amy" > > _______________________________________________ > Toolserver-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l > _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
