Christopher Grant schrieb:
>> But what when individual tools break? Which ones are important enough
>> to try and keep running (even when people leave).
> 
> Wasn't that the point of the stable server? Having the all important
> tools on a stable server, and with at least two developers. So if
> someone leaves the tool doesn't die.

Indeed. Though sadly, it isn't taken up very well. I'm no exception: i have
several tools which should go to stable (CheckUsage being the most prominent I
guess), but the codebase is so terrible, I hate to impose it on anyone :)

better ways to making tools more stable is of course also an important topic.

-- daniel

_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l

Reply via email to