On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 1:56 PM, MZMcBride <[email protected]> wrote: > It's almost as though you're encouraging bikeshedding.[1] I imagine most > developers don't give a damn what you call it as long as it works well. I'm > certainly in that category. > > There are a lot of obstacles to overcome in order to develop a decent, > working translation tool. The focus of any discussion should be on those > actual, real obstacles, not on naming. :-)
I had the same thoughts when I read your e-mail. I was like "ooh, yay, someone's doing this!" and then I read more and was like "wow, are we really talking about all of this stuff? so confusing and pointless. =[" You don't need to come up with complicated names, especially not yet. :-) Just work on writing it and fixing issues, and then we can think of coming up with a name that's straightforward and useful. -- Casey Brown Cbrown1023 _______________________________________________ Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected]) https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
