In my opinion, I suggest that
(1) global bots which are on ts should have access to the MMP,
(2) we shall grant every wiki (or at least every major wiki) a user
(or more than one, if the wiki is big) in the MMP for it.

In this way, we may try to reflect the current situation: we have both
*bots which are active in a wiki only, controlling its pages,
*global bots wandering around.
I think that for what concern the bots involved in the (2) above, a
good idea could be asking each group of ts users working on a certain
wiki to take a decision according also to the thoughts of their wiki.
On a brief discussion on it.wiki bot runners' IRC channel, there were
suggested (I don't know whether this is possible or not) to set up a
"fake user" for interwiki on it.wiki usable by every it.wiki ts user,
in order that, in case a bot runner will stop his/her activity,
interwiki will have no problem.  While, bots of group (1) I think are
already determined.

I am interested in this issue. In fact, I was asked by DaB to find 5
or more users to found the MMP, but I hadn't been successful (and i
had also to slow down my presence on wikimedia projects due to real
life...).

:) Best wishes,
Nickanc


2012/3/1 Toto Azéro <[email protected]>:
> Hi all!
> As, so far — to my knowlegde, nothing has been settled regarding the new MMP 
> interwiki, I suggest that *WE* (TS users, as DaB said) speed up this step... 
> It would be a pity if nothing has been done at April 2nd, when the new rule 
> 9.4 will be effective (no continous interwiki-bot on the TS)...
> But how to choose users who will be in the MMP and actually who will be 
> entirely responsive of the bot ? I think an election would be a bit difficult 
> to organize - but if someone who has spare time feels like organizing it, why 
> not ?
> So I suggest that people interested in getting involved in the project let 
> all the TS users know it, emailing the toolserver-l list... Then, TS users 
> could support or critize one or more persons till a consensus is found... And 
> in this mannner, people designed will have a few weeks (about a fortnight I 
> think, but it depends on the last of the debate).
>
> Here is my plan... What do you think about it ? Any other ideas ?
>
> Personally, I've run a globally flagged interwiki-bot (ZéroBot) for a while, 
> under a script I wrote (but still using interwiki.py from the pywikipediabot 
> framework), and I'm pretty interested in being a member of the MMP...
> _______________________________________________
> Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected])
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
> Posting guidelines for this list: 
> https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette

_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list ([email protected])
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list: 
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette

Reply via email to