Hardy,
Wow, that is great results ! I am anxious to get mine up. It has been
raining a lot here in northern CA and I am
doing the antenna work sporadically on dryer days.
Thanks for sharing your results Hardy.
Bob
K6UJ
On 12/15/15 5:11 PM, Hardy Landskov wrote:
Bob,
I ran the same thing for years here in AZ with great results. 4 elevated
radials at 12 feet, Each was 132 feet long. Worked 237 countries.
Hardy N7RT
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert
Harmon
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 4:59 PM
To: Mike Waters
Cc: topband
Subject: Re: Topband: QRP
Mike,
Thats good stuff ! I am putting up a 160 with 4 elevated radials at 14
feet (would like to get them higher
but they are the least visible at 14 feet to my wife :-) I am anxious to see
how it works.
thanks for the reference info!
Bob
K6UJ
On 12/15/15 3:50 PM, Mike Waters wrote:
According to this they are close.
lists.contesting.com/_topband/2007-11/msg00248.html
<http://lists.contesting.com/_topband/2007-11/msg00248.html>
www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems
<http://www.antennasbyn6lf.com/design_of_radial_ground_systems> -
scroll down to the section "QEX article on elevated radial ground
systems" and study the material in the links.
I was amazed at how well just two elevated radials work here, though I
plan on four someday.
www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html#inv-l_antenna
<http://www.w0btu.com/160_meters.html#inv-l_antenna>
73, Mike
www.w0btu.com <http://www.w0btu.com>
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Robert Harmon <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Do the 160 verticals with 4 radials elevated at 20 feet,
individually outperform the other vertical with 60 radials on the
ground ?
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
