I did JT65 on 160, but really what´s the challenge? Is amazing when you did a CW qso, switching between RX antennas, filters and radio adjustments to pull out a callsign
I don´t know what people than been on topband for decades feel about that 73. Jorge CX6VM/CW5W 2017-05-13 17:42 GMT-03:00 Mike Waters <[email protected]>: > Maybe some do. But I usually turn the speakers off when operating digital > modes. > > That extra 2 dB over JT65 --as well as freeing up large portions of the > band-- ought to matter to more hams. > > 73, Mike > www.w0btu.com > > On May 13, 2017 3:32 PM, "Brian Pease" <[email protected]> wrote: > > This may sound strange, but my opinion is that hams like the musical tones > of JT65. > > > On 5/13/2017 3:27 PM, Mike Waters wrote: > > > Why not JT9? It has a 2 dB improvement in S/N ratio on 160, while using > > only 1/10 of the bandwidth. > > > > I cannot understand why JT9 is used so little on 160 thru 20. JT65 is a > VHF > > mode. > > > > physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.html > > > > > > 73, Mike > > www.w0btu.com > > > > On May 13, 2017 2:03 PM, "James Denneny" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I am hoping more DX stations will take advantage of the JT65 mode on 1838 > > next season. I have been using it on 20M recently and am amazed at its > > weak > > signal performance. > > > > This mode should enhance the capture of DX entities on TB particularly > with > > propagation decline. It's main drawback is the time involved with > exchanges > > due to decoding but, the enhanced performance makes up for that. > > > > Jim > > > > K7EG > > _________________ > > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > > > > > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > _________________ > Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband > -- 73, Jorge CX6VM/CW5W _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
