WSJT-X 1.7.0 Mike Waters <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's interesting. Thank you for sharing that with us. > > What software are you using, Brian? Joe Taylor's, or some other? > > I'm guessing you're only using the wide SSB filter. In any case, I'll have > to try that and see, using CW and SSB filters. > > 73, Mike www.w0btu.com > > On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Brian D G3VGZ > <[email protected] > > wrote: > > > > > I find the better ability for JT65 to decode co-channel signals with its > > two pass decoding makes up for any 2dB improvement in decoding JT9. I > > also find a single static crash can take out JT9 decodes, more so than > > JT65. > > > > > > Why not JT9? It has a 2 dB improvement in S/N ratio on 160, while > > > > using only 1/10 of the bandwidth. > > > > > > > > I cannot understand why JT9 is used so little on 160 thru 20. JT65 > > > > is a VHF mode. > > > > > > > > physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/wsjtx.html > > > _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - > http://www.contesting.com/_topband > > -- Brian D G3VGZ _________________ Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
