Perfect.
On Jan 7, 4:02 pm, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jody,
>
> I have just added a new property function called tops:for that will
> help with such iterations. The syntax would be (in an
> sml:IterateOverSelect)
>
> sml:selectQuery = SELECT ?index WHERE { ?index tops:for (1 10) }
>
> to have the body of the loop repeated with ?index = [1..10] as input.
> The body could then have your sml:ApplyConstruct module which can
> access the ?index variable.
>
> This will be published with beta 2 in February.
>
> Holger
>
> On Jan 1, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Jody wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > The script I was making was to create test data for an ontology. I
> > was trying to create a user specified number of instances of type a
> > certain class. Scott, I was using the EnterLiteral module to get the
> > number of instances. This is similar to an example you all had put
> > out for creating a TBC/Eclipse plugin.
>
> > The loop I was looking for would allow me to run the Construct module
> > a given number of times. for(int i=0; i<x;i++) It seems possible
> > with the given modules but it's proving difficult to increment the
> > count variable (i) once it is bound.
>
> > On Dec 30 2008, 3:06 pm, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >> Yes I believe we will need a bit more details to understand your use
> >> case. You could potentially use sml:PerformUpdate to replace (DELETE/
> >> INSERT) a triple that keeps track of the status. However that's
> >> pretty
> >> difficult. The next TBC version (scheduled for tomorrow) will have a
> >> module sml:IterateWhile that might be useful. But if you can confirm
> >> your use case we may add another type of loop similar to a for-loop
> >> in
> >> programming languages.
>
> >> Holger
>
> >> On Dec 30, 2008, at 11:58 AM, Scott Henninger wrote:
>
> >>> Jody; The "already bound" error occurs because your BindBySelect
> >>> module is trying to create the variable ?count, which was already
> >>> created in EnterLiteral (or whatever you used to get the ?count
> >>> value
> >>> from the user).
>
> >>> It's not clear how your script works, but you can perform your
> >>> change
> >>> to ?count in the ApplyConstruct module.
>
> >>> -- Scott
>
> >>> On Dec 30, 12:25 pm, Jody <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> How can I specify, in an elegant manner, that I want to iterate
> >>>> over a
> >>>> sub-script x times.
>
> >>>> Currently I am not using the iterateOverSelect because I haven't
> >>>> wrapped my head around what variable I would bind. Instead I'm
> >>>> trying
> >>>> to use a BranchByAsk.
>
> >>>> Here is the general flow:
> >>>> Get the iteration number {?count} from the user
> >>>> :next :BranchByAsk
> >>>> :askQuery ASK{ FILTER( ?count >= 0 ) }
> >>>> :else (Do nothing :mergeModule)
> >>>> :if :ApplyConstruct (this creates individuals of a certain
> >>>> type
> >>>> referencing the ?count in buildURI())
> >>>> :next :BindBySelect (decrease the ?count variable using
> >>>> LET)
> >>>> :next :BranchByAsk (complete loop and test again)
>
> >>>> I keep getting variable already bound errors in the :BindBySelect
> >>>> module. I've also tried replacing this with an :ApplyConstruct.
>
> >>>> Anybody have this figured out?
>
> >>>> Happy Holidays!
>
> >>>> - Jody- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
