Hi Jim,

the OWL API supports Turtle syntax, which is basically the same as N3.  
N-Triples is a simple sub-set of N3/Turtle, just a plain list of  
triples.

OWL 2 is not a new language but just another RDF vocabulary, similar  
to SKOS, FOAF etc. Therefore, you can save any OWL 2 file to RDF file  
formats and triple stores.

Turtle/N3 is therefore still a good choice.

Holger


On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:57 AM, James A Miller wrote:

> I see that this validator claims to support RDF/XML, but not N3 or N- 
> triples.  Due to the better configuration management qualities, all  
> of our (still OWL 1) ontology elements are in N3.
>
> Have these formats fallen out of favor universally, or just at  
> UoManchester?  Do they still work with OWL 2?
>
> Jim
>
>
>
> From: Joe <[email protected]>
> To:   TopBraid Composer Users <[email protected]>
> Date: 11/02/2009 11:42 PM
> Subject:      [tbc-users] Re: Validate OWL species?
> Sent by:      [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
> Ha - it totally works - sorry about that.  Still can't wait to see it
> in TBC ;)
>
> Joe
>
> On Nov 2, 11:31 pm, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You can select OWL 2 RL profile in the validator link below. Does it
> > not work?
> >
> > Holger
> >
> > On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:27 PM, Joe wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Thanks for the tip, but unfortunately with your newest version I  
> was
> > > hoping I could validate my ontology as RL - which as far as I  
> can tell
> > > no other current tool will do.  Hopefully you'll support this in  
> your
> > > paid versions in the near future - as performing this validation  
> is
> > > very helpful in the development of practical semantic  
> applications.
> >
> > > On Nov 2, 11:09 pm, Holger Knublauch <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> > >> Hi Joe,
> >
> > >> this feature has been removed. It is no longer a supported part  
> of
> > >> the
> > >> Jena code base, and has become outdated with OWL 2 anyway. The  
> notion
> > >> of OWL Lite, OWL DL and OWL Full has changed quite a bit. I  
> recommend
> > >> external tools such as
> >
> > >>        http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/validator/
> >
> > >> For these tasks. We may want to integrate such functionality in  
> the
> > >> future.
> >
> > >> Holger
> >
> > >> On Nov 2, 2009, at 8:01 PM, Joe wrote:
> >
> > >>> I feel a little silly asking this, but how do you validate OWL
> > >>> species
> > >>> in the latest version of TBC (release Nov 2, 2009)?
> >
> > >>> In the previous version this functionality was accessed via the
> > >>> "Inferences" menu.
>
>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to