Can someone tell me whether the current use of userdefined datatypes
is still correct? I now use for instance:
<owl:DatatypeProperty rdf:about="#indoorAirSpeedForClosingWindows">
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#OpenableWindowsControlSettings"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="AirSpeed"/>
</owl:DatatypeProperty>
<owl:DataRange rdf:ID="AirSpeed">aparte
<owl11:onDataRange rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/
XMLSchema#float"/>
</owl:DataRange>
(split or combined)
which works fine in TBC (owl11 being activated).
In the new OWL2 specs it is however very difficult to see if this is
still ok (because of all the functional specification syntax...).
I guess also the owl11 has changed?
thanks for feedback,
Michel Bohms
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TopBraid Composer Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-composer-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
