Michel; It would be helpful if you were more specific on what part of the primer (which one?) you are looking at. As far as equivalentClass is concerned, one way to look at is that subClassOf defines an unnamed class whose members meet the restriction. The equivalentClass definition names the restriction to the name of the class.
How was this code generated? The example has an error in it. It's "owl:equivalentClass", not "rdfs:equivalentClass". Posting the Turtle serialization would make this more readable. -- Scott On Aug 20, 8:59 am, Michel Bohms <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Holger, Scot and others, > > We define user defined datatypes now (as we discussed quite some time > ago) as: > > <rdfs:Datatype rdf:about="http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/IntUBE- > EnergyBIM.owl#BuildingPartType"> > <rdfs:equivalentClass> > <rdfs:Datatype> > <owl:onDatatype rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string"/> > <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > <rdf:rest rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ > 1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"/> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >Door</rdf:first> > </rdf:rest> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >Window</rdf:first> > </rdf:rest> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >Panel</rdf:first> > </rdf:rest> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >Wall</rdf:first> > </rdf:rest> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >SlopingRoof</rdf:first> > </rdf:rest> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >FlatRoof</rdf:first> > </rdf:rest> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > XMLSchema#string" > >Floor</rdf:first> > </owl:oneOf> > </rdfs:Datatype> > </rdfs:equivalentClass> > </rdfs:Datatype> > > I have still two questions here: > > 1. Is EquivalentClass (as was also used in the primer) really ok? > Shouldn't it be subClass (now all string with this allowed set are > always aBuildingPartType which is ok but if the restriction are milder > like >0 then it becomes more discutable since there are many > userdefined datatype that can be represented by a positive integer.. > > 2. In the primer in case of restriction like >x and <y, the tag > withRestriction is used. Should this tag also not be used HERE in case > of a oneOf which can also be regarded as a restriction? > > thanks for advice, Michel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
