OK, thanks for the clarification, Michel. For item #1, you should be able to replace owl:equivalentClass with rdfs:subClassOf without any trouble. For item #2, it's really a questions for the OWL 2 standards committee.
-- Scott On Aug 20, 4:12 pm, "Bohms, H.M. (Michel)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Scott, > > Thanks for the bug (code is generated by our own excell to owl converter). > (very strange btw we did not saw this trivial one earlier....anyway). > > Wrt Primer ref: forhttp://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/ > > At 1.2 set "show rdf/xml" syntax. > > Then in Chapter 7 see the example "tiddlerAge": > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="toddlerAge"> > <owl:equivalentClass> > <rdfs:Datatype> > <owl:oneOf> > <rdf:Description> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="&xsd;integer">1</rdf:first> > <rdf:rest> > <rdf:Description> > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="&xsd;integer">2</rdf:first> > <rdf:rest > rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"/> > </rdf:Description> > </rdf:rest> > </rdf:Description> > </owl:oneOf> > </rdfs:Datatype> > </owl:equivalentClass> > </rdf:Description> > > (or in turtle: > :toddlerAge owl:equivalentClass > [ rdf:type rdfs:Datatype; > owl:oneOf ( "1"^^xsd:integer "2"^^xsd:integer ) > ] . > ) > > Here you see my two issues: > > 1. it says equivalentClass > you would expect a subClass since not every > string with these two allowed values is necc. a "toddlerAge". Clearly this > issue becomes more clear when the restrictions are weaker and therefore less > specifying. > > 2. This construct does not have the "<owl:withRestrictions > rdf:parseType="Collection">" > part in in like in earlier examples in chapter 7. > > Somehow this "one of" is not seen as an item under under withRestrictions but > something alternative to it. > > Hope this clarifies, thanks again for your feedback, > Michel > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Henninger > > Sent: vrijdag 20 augustus 2010 17:20Then at chapter 7 > > To: TopBraid Suite Users > > Subject: [topbraid-users] Re: userdefined datatype revisited > > > Michel; It would be helpful if you were more specific on what > > part of the primer (which one?) you are looking at. As far > > as equivalentClass is concerned, one way to look at is that > > subClassOf defines an unnamed class whose members meet the > > restriction. The equivalentClass definition names the > > restriction to the name of the class. > > > How was this code generated? The example has an error in it. > > It's "owl:equivalentClass", not "rdfs:equivalentClass". > > Posting the Turtle serialization would make this more readable. > > > -- Scott > > > On Aug 20, 8:59 am, Michel Bohms <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear Holger, Scot and others, > > > > We define user defined datatypes now (as we discussed quite > > some time > > > ago) as: > > > > <rdfs:Datatype > > rdf:about="http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/IntUBE- > > > EnergyBIM.owl#BuildingPartType"> > > > <rdfs:equivalentClass> > > > <rdfs:Datatype> > > > <owl:onDatatype rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string"/> > > > <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:parseType="Resource"> > > > <rdf:rest rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ > > > 1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#nil"/> > > > <rdf:first > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >Door</rdf:first> > > > </rdf:rest> > > > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >Window</rdf:first> > > > </rdf:rest> > > > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >Panel</rdf:first> > > > </rdf:rest> > > > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >Wall</rdf:first> > > > </rdf:rest> > > > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >SlopingRoof</rdf:first> > > > </rdf:rest> > > > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >FlatRoof</rdf:first> > > > </rdf:rest> > > > <rdf:first rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/ > > > XMLSchema#string" > > > >Floor</rdf:first> > > > </owl:oneOf> > > > </rdfs:Datatype> > > > </rdfs:equivalentClass> > > > </rdfs:Datatype> > > > > I have still two questions here: > > > > 1. Is EquivalentClass (as was also used in the primer) really ok? > > > Shouldn't it be subClass (now all string with this allowed set are > > > always aBuildingPartType which is ok but if the restriction > > are milder > > > like >0 then it becomes more discutable since there are many > > > userdefined datatype that can be represented by a positive integer.. > > > > 2. In the primer in case of restriction like >x and <y, the tag > > > withRestriction is used. Should this tag also not be used > > HERE in case > > > of a oneOf which can also be regarded as a restriction? > > > > thanks for advice, Michel > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > > Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which > > include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, > > SPARQLMotion and SPIN. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en > > This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER > athttp://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
