One thought is to save the model in Turtle, which is less verbose and hence loads faster than the XML serializations, with the added benefit of being human readable.
-- Scott On Dec 26, 8:09 pm, bimargulies <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm trying out TopBraid for the first time, and I'm not getting too > far. > > I start with an OWL file developed in Protege. > > When I open it in TB, I get a complaint of missing imports. > > I can't see why; purl (for example) is not referenced in the file at > all. > > More alarmingly, all the content disappears inside of TB. All it will > show me is the following. All my content is missing. > > Saving doesn't make it disappear in the file on disk. > > <owl:Ontology rdf:about=""> > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">An ontology for entity references as > extracted by REX.</rdfs:comment> > <owl:imports rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl"/> > <j.0:imports rdf:resource="http://topbraid.org/spin/owlrl-all"/> > </owl:Ontology> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
