Hi Scott, see after :
> No, the original issue of untyped resources is not explained > by the import structure, and there are no problem with > defining an extra import statement in the comment header. > This is not the source of your problems. :well I added the owl:imports <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl> ; Etc. and now my problem is gone so.... > For imports the ?model owl:imports <imported-model> is required. > Composer adds an import statement to the comment field to > support scanning files for imports. This enables efficient > processing of imported files when, for example, changing a > base URI that is used by (imported by) other models. :ahh, ok, efficiency...I would propose not to interprete comments for this... > > You can remove the comment with no consequences. It is > superfluous, but convenient for ontology editing. > > In your case, the owl:imports statement was missing. The > commented imports line will have no impact, and therefore the > model was not imported. :yep, right > > It's always important to let us know when files are > hand-edited or created by some external entity, as this can > help us diagnose what the potential causes of the problem(s) are. :ok, but since our ontologies are quite meta-like they are sometimes easier to edit in Turtle directly than in tbc, but ok, I see your point..... > > I don't know where we are w.r.t. the original "untypes refs" > issue, so let us know if there are further questions. :these where caused by the missing owl imports since the underlying types where in the ttls to be imported :so all solved now (well except my server problem but this is something else) :thx a lot!, Michel > > -- Scott > > On Feb 15, 2:23 pm, "Bohms, H.M. (Michel)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If I let tbc add impport to correct I get: > > > > # Saved by TopBraid on Tue Feb 15 21:19:15 CET 2011 # > > baseURI:http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/ob.ttl > > # imports:http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl > > > > @prefix : <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/ob.ttl#> . > > @prefix mm: <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl#> . > > @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . > > @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . > > @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . > > @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . > > > > <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/ob.ttl> > > rdf:type owl:Ontology ; > > owl:imports <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl> ; > > owl:versionInfo "Created with TopBraid Composer"^^xsd:string . > > > > So it adds BESIDES the: > > # imports:http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl > > Als a line: > > owl:imports <http://www.bimtoolset.org/ontologies/mm.ttl> ; > > > > Is this the issue and if so: why double? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which > include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, > SPARQLMotion and SPIN. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en > This e-mail and its contents are subject to the DISCLAIMER at http://www.tno.nl/disclaimer/email.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group "TopBraid Suite Users", the topics of which include TopBraid Composer, TopBraid Live, TopBraid Ensemble, SPARQLMotion and SPIN. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/topbraid-users?hl=en
